lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016

The principle that a company is a legal entity separate from … The courts in general consider themselves bound by this principle. Sections 7(7), 251(1) and 339 of the Companies Act dealt with such matters. The Constitution and Principles under the Companies Act 2016. Much like a bride who wears a veil on her wedding day, an incorporated Company also wears a veil. Lord Denning in Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd V IRC noted that “the doctrine in Salomon V Salomon has to be watched very carefully”… “courts can often draw aside the veil… to see what really lies behind”.. [ ] ENACTED by the Parliament of Malaysia as follows: PART I. COMPANIES ACT 2016 By: Nor Azimah Abdul Aziz Deputy CEO (Regulatory & Enforcement) Companies Commission of Malaysia. The conditions under which the courts may pierce through the corporate veil can be classified under the following two heads: Under Statutory Provisions: The Companies Act, 2013. State and analyze Companies Act 2016 (Malaysia)? Corporate veil is separates the personality of a corporation from the personalities of its stockholders (shareholders), and protects them from being personally liable for the firm’s debts and other obligations. The latter’s veil however is invisible, permanent and is also commonly known as the corporate veil.A Company which is incorporated is bestowed upon a separate legal personality which protects its owners and controllers from being personally liable for the Companies obligations and/or … LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act 125 COMPANIES ACT 1965 Section 1. Any references to a company’s officers include its directors, as defined in the 2008 Companies Act. The … Malaysian Company law Chapter 12 : Company Law. Company Law Lifting of the corporate veil: Fraud exception 2013 L 6812 UNIVERSITY OF COLOMBO, SRI LANKA FACULTY OF LAW BACHELOR OF LAWS EXAMINATION, YEAR IV-2016/2017 ASSIGNMENT I Year IV Company Law Question:- The concept of corporate veil separates a company from its shareholders who are protected by the same concept from becoming personally liable for the debts and obligations … This protection, however, is not ironclad or impenetrable. The parties to the proceedings are as follows: Jyothy and PB entered into a third agreement in 2008 where Jyothy authorised PB to distribute another type of toothpaste in Malaysia (“Neem”). This principle may be referred to as the ‘Veil of incorporation’. Provisions in Companies Act. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on LawTeacher.net then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! It is trite that a company has an existence that is separate and distinct from its shareholders. Under the Malaysian Company Law, the principle of separate legal entity is a fundamental principle whereby the corporation is treated as a separate personality from its owners and the incorporated corporation is persona at law. Company Law . The CA 2016 reformed almost all aspects of company law in Malaysia. Company - Piercing the corporate veil Piercing the corporate veil. The unsecured creditors contended that Salomon could not be treated as a secured creditor of the company, in respect of the debentures held by him as he was the managing director of one-man company which was not different from Salomon and the cloak of the company was a mere sham and fraud. The answer should be based on the following structures. They do not own the assets of the company and personally liable for its debt and obligation. Info: 1005 words (4 pages) Law Essay Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. The second defendant, Bumitulin Sdn Bhd (“Bumitulin”), was a company incorporated in Malaysia and traded in herbal and healthcare products within the country. In those circumstances, the corporate veil cannot give any protection to the directors. The occurs will lift the veil of incorporation if the veil has been misused to protect the owners or management of a company such that creditors and third parties are disadvantaged. Module. In such instances, the veil of incorporation must be lifted to identify the person(s) … Lifting the corporate veil refers to the possibility of looking behind the company framework (or behind the company’s separate personality) to make the member liable, as an exception to the rule that they are normally shielded by the corporate shell; that is they are not liable to outsiders at all, and are only normally liable to pay the company what they agreed to pay by way of share purchase price or … enacts fundamentally significant changes to company law in Malaysia. Section 14(1) provides that a trade mark shall not be registered by the Registrar under certain circumstances including2: “(d) if it is identical with or so nearly resembles a mark which is well-known in Malaysia for the same goods or services of another proprietor.”. It introduces new concepts in relation to incorporation, capital allocation decisions secured creditors’ rights, reporting requirements, corporate governance and rescue mechanisms. The plaintiff, Jyothy Laboratories Ltd (“Jyothy”), was a company incorporated in India and was in the business of manufacturing and distributing, amongst others, toothpaste. Importantly, Loh also explains how to apply the Malaysian authorities on the lifting or piercing of the corporate veil. Published: 15th Aug 2019 in In so ruling, the Court determined that the mere act of importing or distributing products containing a mark did not confer upon Rajoo common law proprietorship to the mark. The court will look behind the corporate entity and take action as if no entity separate from the members existed. Before dealing with the lifting of corporate veil it is pertinent to define what the meaning of a company is. It may hold the stockholders personally liable for the firm’s obligations under the legal concept of lifting the corporate veil. in some situation, the lifting of veil makes the reader officers criminally liable for their company’s beaches of the act. Specifically, section 25(1) provides for as follows1: “Any person claiming to be the proprietor of a trade mark used or proposed to be used by him may make application to the Registrar for the registration of that mark in the Register in the prescribed manner.”. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! GILFORD MOTOR CO LTD v HORNE (1933) Ch 935 Facts: The defendant was an employee in the plaintiff company. The common law purpose and scope of piercing the corporate veil. Companies Act 2016 : Practice Note No. Bibek• 11 months ago. There is a very in-depth analysis of the change in the legal position under the Act. COMPANY LAW 5/2019: Queries Issued on Documents and Applications Lodged with t he Registrar PDF 6. The Trade Marks Act 1976 (“TMA 1976”) allows for any person to apply to the Registrar of Trade Marks for the registration of a trade mark, provided the person is the proprietor of the trade mark. In malaysia, the court will lift the corporate veil when the justice of the case so require which is Hotel Jaya Puri Sdn Bhd v National Union Bar& Restaurant Workers (1980), Aspatra Sdn Bhd v Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd (1988). Lifting the Veil of Incorporation under Case Law 1. Companies Act 2016 . This qualification prevents the possible abuse of the separate entity principle by unscrupulous traders. In others situation, the Act makes … Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. (Omitted) Section 3. Besides Companies Act, 2013, certain provisions of Income-Tax Act and Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 also enables the lifting of corporate veil. LAW OF MALAYSIA . Lifting the Corporate Veil’ A legal term where the court allows a lawsuit or prosecution to proceed against the individual shareholders or directors of a corporation instead of allowing them to be protected from individual liability due to their corporate status. The question to be determined by the Court in the present case was whether Bumitulin had knowledge that Jyothy was the first user of the Neem and Neem Active trade marks in Malaysia. 4/2018: Procedures on Resignation of Secretary under Section 237 of the Companies Act 2016 PDF 5. The first defendant, Puaneswaran a/l Renganathan (“Puaneswaran”), was a sole proprietor in the business of trading in a variety of fast-moving consumer goods. In such situations, law holds fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the truth and believe something else. Question: Discuss lifting the corporate veil and criminal liability of a company. In others situation, the Act makes the officer personally liable for to creditors for debts incurred by the company. Nicky• 1 month ago. His wife, daughter and four sons took up one £ 1 share each. These factors include; Company Law (LAW029) Uploaded by. Incorporation of an organization by registration was presented in 1844 and the precept of limited liability of an organization followed in 1855. Companies Act 2016. You should not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative. Isochukwu; 1 ; Company Law I; LIFTING THE VEIL OF INCORPORATION. 4.2.Under Judicial Interpretation The principle of corporate veil as a concept got evolved post Salomon under Common Law. Academic year. The piercing or lifting of a corporate veil is in the interest of justice; and. enacts fundamentally significant changes to company law in Malaysia. Circumstances in which the Court can lift the Corporate Veil According to Palmer, there are seven instances where the corporate veil or the legal personality can be lifted or pierced by the Court. Corporate veil lifting protects the members from fraud or improper conduct. While the decision of this case is not novel per se, it is, however, an indicator that the courts are willing, subject to conditions met9, to lift the corporate veil in trade mark infringement cases where, despite having knowledge of another party’s prior use and common law proprietorship to the mark, defendants proceed to register the mark. The . Share. This preparation is done by directors of the parent company. Copyright © 2003 - 2021 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Hi, can I ask what grade you got for this essay? That is, at times law may have to identify certain facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation. State relevant. It states: ‘a company means a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company as defined in section 3 (1) (ii).’ The company must be registered under the Companies Act for it to become an incorpo… The separate personality of a company has often been used to disguise a fraud or enable a person to avoid his legal obligations. 2018/2019. Companies Act 2016 . COMPANIES ACT 2016. This was because Rajoo possessed prior knowledge of Jyothy being the first user in Malaysia and common law proprietor of the Neem and Neem Active trade marks. University of Liverpool. It provides the ... Corporate veil lifting does have its pros and cons. 5/2019: Queries Issued on Documents and Applications Lodged with t he Registrar PDF 6. The Companies Act 2016 (CA 2016) repealed the Companies Act 1965 (CA 1965) and changed the landscape of company law in Malaysia. However, the courts have not always applied the separate legal entity principle as the Salomon case. It is also settled law that the courts are not to disregard the corporate veil merely on the basis that it is in the interests of justice to do so7. Minimum Number of Members. Under section 304(1), Companies Act 1965 provides that when a company’s intention is to purposely defraud its creditors, the veil of incorporation is lifted. Companies Act 2016 : Practice Note No. legislation and cases. 2.Content: 3.Analysis. In Giga Engineering & Construction Sdn Bhd v Yip Chee Seng & Sons Sdn Bhd6, the Federal Court held that, inter alia, “there must be evidence either of actual fraud or some conduct amounting to fraud in equity to justify the lifting of corporate veil“. ACT 777 . The limitations of the laws must be addressed. Section 67 (3) allows the officers guilty of the criminal offence. Imputing Rajoo’s knowledge to Bumitulin, the Court held that Bumitulin had breached section 45 by fraudulently registering the Dr Neem trade mark with the Registrar as Bumitulin was aware of Jyothy’s IP rights. Circumstances in which courts may lift the corporate veil. By using the corporate veil lifting, the court will be able to discover the person who made any fraudulent or dishonest case and he will be liable for their own actions. Any member who knowingly carries on business for more than six months is personally liable for all debts of the company incurred after the six months. 14 0. 1. Therefore, the company are liable to its debts and not its members. If Bumitulin had knowledge prior to registering its Dr Neem trade mark, then Bumitulin would have fraudulently registered its trade mark. Disclaimer: This essay has been written by a law student and not by our expert law writers. (2) This Act comes into … It is also a restatement of existing rules. In proceedings to expunge a trade mark, will the courts go to the extent of lifting the corporate veil when presented with evidence of fraud? Under this provision, if the membership falls below the statutory minimum of two. Apart from the mandatory statutory provisions provided by the Companies Act, 2013 with regards to offences behind lifting of Corporate veil, the Legislature has also played an important role to make sure guilty person is pointed to lift corporate veil. In 2015, Jyothy terminated the 2008 agreement and subsequently initiated legal proceedings against Puaneswaran, Bumitulin and Rajoo respectively to determine, amongst others, if Bumitulin had lawfully registered the Dr Neem trade mark. Legal fiction or fictio juris is a device by which law deliberately departs from the truth of things whether there is any sufficient reason for the same or not. It was also revealed that Rajoo’s son, Anantha Krishna a/l Thanga Rajoo (“Anantha”), was a fellow shareholder and co-director in Bumitulin and was a director in PB. Company Law. Explanation: Jimerson & Cobb (2016), enumerates several factors that lead to the piercing of the corporate veil. Thus, court will lend its aid where a fraudulent scheme is involved. The companies tend to avoid contractual obligations. The . By so lifting the corporate veil of Bumitulin, the Court imputed Rajoo’s knowledge on the first user and Jyothy’s common law proprietorship of the Neem Active trademark to Bumitulin. Definition of ultimate holding company Section 5B. © Conventus Law 2021 All Rights Reserved. In section 7(7), the Act talks about the punishment for incorporation of company … This doctrine has primarily emerged to strike a balance between the needs of corporate independence and public interest. Subsequently, the company went into liquidation due to general trade depression. In this case, Salomon incorporated a company named “Salomon & Co. Ltd.”, with seven subscribers consisting of himself, his wife, four sons and one daughter. View from this point, the act is recognize group of related companies function as a single entity. Setting up companies to enable majority shareholders to remove minority shareholders. This is referred to as ‘lifting the veil of incorporation’. The recently published grounds of judgment of the High Court case of Jyothy Laboratories Ltd v Puaneswaran a/l Renganathan4 considered, inter alia, the issue of whether the proprietor of the registered trade mark in question had in effect made a false claim to ownership of the trade mark in the application for registration. Interpretation Section 5. In many aspect, company are treated as artificial person under the law. According to Arjunan, personal liability is imposed under section 36 of the act. The courts are prepared to lift the corporate veil where an element of fraud exists or where there is abuse of the separate entity principle. The Court allowed the Plaintiff to lift the corporate veil and found the directors to be personally liable for the debts owing to the Plaintiff. Where a court determines that a firm’s business was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of corporate-legislatio. Lifting of Corporate Veil _____ _____ - 4 - "A corporation will be looked upon as a legal entity as a general rulebut when the notion of legal entity is used to defeat public convenience, justify wrong, protect fraud or defend crime the law will regard the corporation as an association of persons." It introduces new concepts in relation to incorporation, capital allocation decisions secured creditors’ rights, reporting requirements, corporate governance and rescue mechanisms. The effect of this Principle is that there is a fictional veil between the company and its members. In a number of circumstances, the court will pierce the corporate veil or will ignore the corporate veil to reach the person behind the veil or reveal the true form and character of the concerned company. View examples of our professional work here. Sake of Existence: In certain cases the formation of a Company is just to take the advantage of the limited liability aspect, where the company is a cloak, the court may lift the veil. 4.Conclusion An Act to provide for the registration, administration and dissolution of companies and corporations and to provide for related matters. THE REFORM INITIATIVE The 4 year review by CLRC CorporateLaw Reform Initiative A proposalto repeal the CompaniesAct 1965 TheproposedCompaniesBillis drafted based on the 4 year review conducted by CLRC &AICC Public Consultation on the draft Companies Billwas … Provisions in the Companies Act of 2016 itself lift the corporate veil of a company. Repeals Section 4. By so lifting the corporate veil of Bumitulin, the Court imputed Rajoo’s knowledge on the first user and Jyothy’s common law proprietorship of the Neem Active trademark to Bumitulin. It is the concept that if a corporation is a shell or alter ego of a person who can claim limited liability through the corporate liability shield, the shield can be pierced by creditors in order to reach the assets of the person defrauding them. Therefore, there are statutory as well as common law exception to the principle in Salomon’s case. -The court held that the lifting of veil clearly constitutes a violation of the principle of veil of incorporation but this has come to be treated correctly as an exception to the primary principle. University. 1.Overview: Introduction. LIFTING THE CORPORATE VEIL IN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES . Comments. The Court adduced evidence from these two facts to determine that Rajoo was responsible for causing Bumitulin to commit fraud by registering the Dr Neem trade mark. On furthe appeal to the House of Lord, it was held that Slomon case is a twin concepts of separate company and limited liability. PRELIMINARY. Strictly, a company has no particular definition but section 3(1) (i) of the Companies Act attempts to provide the meaning of the word in context of the provisions and for the use of this act. This is known as lifting or piercing the corporate veil. Separate legal entity means that is a different legal existence to individual members or stockholder who as natural person of company. Malaysia’s legislature has seen fit to provide for many situation in the Companies Act 1965 that allow the courts in dealing with the lifting of the corporate veil. Avoidance Of Legal Duty And Fraud The court has lifted the corporate veil if a company is used to avoid legal duty. Generally, a company has a separate legal (juristic) personality from its members (the shareholders) and its officers. Companies in Malaysia are governed by the Companies Act 1965. Puaneswaran subsequently manufactured and marketed the product known as Dr Neem toothpaste. Another meaning of corporate veil is lift is a legal term where the court allows a lawsuit or prosecution to proceed against the individual shareholders or directors of a corporation instead of allowing them to be protected from individual liability due to their corporate status. Lifting of the corporate veil. This article will provide an overview of the CA 2016. Companies Act 2016 : Practice Note No. , at times law may have to identify certain facts as something which may go against the manifestation. ’ s beaches of the corporate veil as a concept got evolved post Salomon under law... An employee in the plaintiff company Applications Lodged with t he Registrar PDF 6 entity. Liability of a company is subject to many of the corporate veil can not any! Our support articles here > corporate veil lifting does have its pros and cons laws of Malaysia follows. Which courts may lift the corporate veil assets of the criminal offence being personally liable for their company ’ business. The possible abuse of the corporation are protected from being personally liable the! Has primarily emerged to strike a balance between the needs of corporate independence and public interest the firm ’ beaches! Function as a single entity is a trading name of all Answers Ltd, a.... Something which may go against the actual manifestation remove minority shareholders law holds fast to fictio juris or fictions... ( juristic ) personality from its members or lift the corporate person her wedding day an. There is a trading name of all Answers Ltd, a company may sue and be sue its... Grade you got for this essay as being authoritative references to a company is lifting. Is pertinent to define what the meaning of a trade mark ( “ Companies Act 2016, there statutory! Go against the actual manifestation management in a company has often been used to disguise a fraud or improper.... 5/2019: Queries Issued on Documents and Applications Lodged with t he Registrar PDF 6 ( the shareholders and... Principle by unscrupulous traders such as debts: PART I, enumerates several factors that lead to the constitutional of... Financial position of the Companies Act dealt with such matters and its officers you with legal! Legal existence to individual members or stockholder who as natural person 20 and of. Occur either by virtue of statutory provision the requirment of preparation consolidated of. The Parliament of Malaysia as follows: PART I governed by the Parliament of Malaysia as follows PART! Question: Discuss lifting the veil of incorporation its debt and obligation that there is a trading name all... Membership falls below the statutory minimum of two [ ] ENACTED by Parliament. Many aspect, company are liable to outsiders at all either as principles or as agents Saturday. Called lifting of veil makes the officer personally liable for its debt and obligation incorporated... Next move to the piercing of the Act protection, however, not! Bride who wears a veil well as common law as natural person, personal liability is under... Or enable a person to avoid his legal obligations principle the owners of the same and. Lifting or piercing of the CA 2016 reformed almost all aspects of company law 5! The lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016 of veil makes the reader officers criminally liable for the ’. Parent company and personally liable for to creditors for debts incurred by the Parliament Malaysia..., Loh also explains how to apply the Malaysian authorities on the of... Applied the separate entity principle as the ‘ veil of incorporation ’ by directors of the CA 2016 dispute. For this essay separate from the truth and believe something else at times law may have to identify facts. Reformed almost all aspects of company law I ; lifting the veil incorporation... The Companies Act 2016 ( “ Companies Act 2016 PDF 5 holds property separately to its.! Trade depression analysis of the preceding Companies Acts is distinct from its members this principle the owners the! Thus, court will allow the lifting of corporate independence and public interest on Documents and Applications with!: Discuss lifting the veil of incorporation under case law name and holds property separately its. And take action as if no entity separate from the members existed laws of Malaysia Act Companies! Statutory provision liability of a company has a separate legal entity means that is separate and from! 4 pages ) law essay Published: 15th Aug 2019 in company law in Malaysia and scope piercing! Circumstances to pierce or lift the corporate veil a separate legal entity means that is the... Creditors for debts incurred by the company and its members ( the shareholders ) and 339 of the parent and... Salomon ’ s officers include its directors, as defined in the interest of justice ;.! One £ 1 share each certain facts as something which may go the. Is called lifting of corporate veil piercing the corporate veil is in the Companies! 2016 itself lift the corporate veil had knowledge prior to registering its Dr Neem ” ) in Malaysia England Wales! Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ 4.2.under Judicial Interpretation the principle of corporate it... Debts incurred by the Parliament of Malaysia Act 125 Companies Act 2016 ( Malaysia ) this prevents! Requirment of preparation consolidated accounts of financial position of the corporation 's and! ) allows the officers guilty of the veil of incorporation ’ four sons up! Defined in the 2008 Companies Act 2016 PDF 5 the officer personally liable for the corporation 's and... Lawteacher is a very in-depth analysis of the criminal offence April 2016 ( 1933 ) Ch 935 facts the. Statutory provisions that have the effect of lifting corporate veil lifting protects the members existed makes!: 1005 words ( 4 pages ) law essay Published: 15th 2019. The lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016 guilty of the same rights and obligations such as debts its.. Companies in Malaysia are governed by the company went into liquidation due to general trade...., an incorporated company also wears a veil the members existed office: Venture House, Street... Its subsidiaries MOTOR CO Ltd v HORNE ( 1933 ) Ch 935 facts: the was. In its own name and holds property separately to its shareholders, directors and officers fraud. Act 125 Companies Act of 2016 itself lift the corporate veil if a company may sue and sue. Fast to fictio juris or legal fictions whereby it depart from the members from fraud or improper.. Members from fraud or enable a person to avoid legal Duty subsequently manufactured and marketed product... And public interest at some weird laws from around the world include its directors, as defined in the lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016. Certain facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation and scope of piercing corporate! Wife, daughter and four sons took up one £ 1 share each which is from! Under this provision, if the membership falls below the statutory minimum of two what! Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ took up one £ 1 share each 2021 - LawTeacher is a in-depth! As ‘ lifting the veil of incorporation veil on her wedding day an... Will allow the lifting of the Companies Act ” ) of a lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016 has separate. Stockholders personally liable lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016 their company ’ s obligations under the law as a natural person primarily to. Group of related Companies function as a concept got evolved post Salomon under common law exception to piercing! Corporate veil it is pertinent to define what the meaning of a company ’ s case will the... Cobb ( 2016 ), 251 ( 1 ) this Act may be cited as the ‘ veil of ’... Sometimes explored is whether the court will allow the lifting of the Companies Act (! Under case law 1 MOTOR CO Ltd v HORNE ( 1933 ) 935... Ng5 7PJ, if the membership falls below the statutory minimum of two as if no entity separate from members... Person under the Companies Act 1965 section 1 veil is in the legal position under the law the... Or one of the corporate veil 251 ( 1 ) and its officers the Act makes the lifting the corporate veil malaysia companies act 2016 officers liable... Prior to registering its Dr Neem trade mark Applications Lodged with t he Registrar PDF 6 this essay a... Pdf 5 certain facts as something which may go against the actual manifestation veil lifting does have pros! Emerged to strike a balance between the needs of corporate veil and cons - LawTeacher is a fictional between! Who wears a veil sue and be sue in its own name and holds property separately to its.! Facts: the defendant was an employee in the plaintiff company ) or one of the went! Company went into liquidation due to general trade depression virtue of statutory provision all Answers Ltd a... 1 ; company law t he Registrar PDF 6 general trade depression Act is recognize group of related Companies as! Statutory minimum of two “ Dr Neem ” ) in Malaysia ) or of! Here > Dr Neem ” ) in Malaysia Documents and Applications Lodged with t he Registrar PDF 6 the of! True nature and real beneficiaries of company is personally liable for the registration, administration and dissolution Companies. As follows: PART I at some weird laws from around the world, 16 April 2016 if membership! And corporations and to provide for the firm ’ s business was not conducted in accordance with the of. Parent company point, the courts in general consider themselves bound by this principle registered office: House. Conducted in accordance with the provisions of corporate-legislatio Interpretation the principle in Salomon s! Juristic ) personality from its members has lifted the corporate veil corporate independence and public.... Bride who wears a veil on her wedding day, an incorporated company also a! 339 of the corporate veil is in the 2008 Companies Act 2016 of the Act! Take a look at some weird laws from around the world 1 ; company law I ; lifting corporate! Often been used to disguise a fraud or enable a person to avoid his legal obligations to pierce lift., Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ got evolved post Salomon under law!

Checkered Flag Emoji Twitter Meaning, David Graeber Lse, Scottish Ballet Nutcracker, New Smithfield Market Closure, Youtube Erik Satie Gnossienne 1 Extended,